The apple contest rules and important information.

TIMEPLAST APPLE DEGRADATION CHALLENGE

Official Rules and Scientific Competition Framework

Effective Date

May 21st, 2026

Sponsor

Timeplast, Inc. (“Timeplast,” “Sponsor,” “Company”).

The $10,000 Apple contest and full-time role opportunity.

Download here a 3D file of an apple. It's print-ready: no tuning, no remeshing, no guesswork. If you print it with Time-Mass Passive, you're in.

1. PURPOSE OF THE CHALLENGE

The Timeplast Apple Degradation Challenge (“Challenge”) is a scientific and environmental research competition designed to encourage participants to apply scientific reasoning, environmental knowledge, experimental design, and documentation skills to identify and validate conditions that maximize the degradation performance of Timeplast materials.

The Challenge is intended to generate meaningful scientific observations regarding environmental degradation pathways and to advance public understanding of material science, environmental conditions, and biodegradation mechanisms.

This Challenge is not a sweepstakes, giveaway, raffle, game of chance, lottery, or random drawing.


2. SKILL-BASED COMPETITION

The Challenge is a merit-based competition.

Winners are selected exclusively through evaluation of participant performance, scientific judgment, research methodology, deployment strategy, documentation quality, and observed outcomes.

No winner is selected by random chance.

Success in the Challenge depends substantially upon:

  • Scientific knowledge

  • Environmental understanding

  • Research ability

  • Experimental design

  • Strategic decision-making

  • Documentation quality

  • Observation skills

  • Analytical reasoning

Participants exercise meaningful control over outcomes through their selection of deployment environments, monitoring methods, reporting quality, and scientific approach.


3. CHALLENGE OBJECTIVE

Participants are challenged to determine where and under what environmental conditions a Timeplast Apple will degrade most effectively.

Participants must:

  • Formulate a hypothesis

  • Select a deployment site

  • Justify their selection using scientific reasoning

  • Monitor degradation

  • Document observations

  • Submit periodic reports

  • Present findings

The Challenge rewards superior scientific judgment and execution.


4. ELIGIBILITY

Open to legal residents of jurisdictions where participation is permitted by law who are:

  • At least 18 years of age

  • Able to lawfully receive prizes

  • Capable of complying with Challenge requirements

Void where prohibited.

Employees, officers, directors, contractors, and immediate family members of Timeplast may not participate.


5. ENTRY REQUIREMENTS

To enter, participants must:

Step 1

Acquire an official Timeplast Apple Challenge Kit.

Step 2

Submit a Deployment Plan containing:

  • Proposed location

  • Environmental description

  • Scientific rationale

  • Expected degradation behavior

  • Predicted outcome

Step 3

Deploy the Apple.

Step 4

Submit periodic documentation as required.

Step 5

Submit a Final Report.

Incomplete submissions may be disqualified.


6. SCIENTIFIC RATIONALE REQUIREMENT

Every participant must provide a written explanation describing:

  • Why the location was selected

  • Expected environmental factors

  • Anticipated degradation mechanisms

  • Scientific reasoning supporting predictions

Examples of relevant factors include:

  • Humidity

  • Temperature

  • Rainfall

  • UV exposure

  • Soil conditions

  • Biological activity

  • Compost activity

  • Microbial populations

  • Water exposure

  • Geographic conditions

The rationale forms a substantial component of judging.


7. REQUIRED DOCUMENTATION

Participants must maintain records including:

Mandatory Evidence

  • Initial deployment photographs

  • GPS coordinates or location description

  • Monthly photographs

  • Environmental observations

  • Weather data when available

  • Final photographs

  • Final report

Timeplast may request additional evidence to verify submissions.


8. JUDGING CRITERIA

Submissions will be evaluated using the following weighted criteria:

A. Scientific Strategy (30%)

Evaluation of:

  • Environmental analysis

  • Site selection quality

  • Scientific reasoning

  • Understanding of degradation processes


B. Experimental Design and Execution (20%)

Evaluation of:

  • Methodology

  • Consistency

  • Reliability

  • Adherence to protocols


C. Documentation Quality (20%)

Evaluation of:

  • Accuracy

  • Completeness

  • Clarity

  • Evidence quality


D. Observed Results (20%)

Evaluation of:

  • Degree of degradation achieved

  • Consistency with scientific hypothesis

  • Measured outcomes

Observed degradation alone does not determine winners.


E. Scientific Contribution (10%)

Evaluation of:

  • Educational value

  • Research usefulness

  • Novel findings

  • Environmental insights


9. WINNER DETERMINATION

Winners are selected by an evaluation panel appointed by Timeplast.

The judging panel may include:

  • Scientists

  • Engineers

  • Material specialists

  • Environmental professionals

  • Academic advisors

Judges evaluate submissions according to published criteria.

Highest-scoring entries win.

No winner is selected randomly.

No drawing is conducted.

No chance-based mechanism is used.

Judges’ decisions are final.


10. PRIZES

Two Grand Prizes

USD $5,000 per prize 

Scientific Recognition Award

Additional awards may be granted at Timeplast’s discretion.

Career Opportunities

Outstanding participants may be invited to discuss employment, consulting, internship, research, or collaboration opportunities.

Participation does not create an employment relationship.

Any future employment opportunity remains subject to:

  • Legal eligibility

  • Company hiring procedures

  • Work authorization requirements

  • Standard evaluation processes

No employment is guaranteed.


11. NO CHANCE ELEMENT

The Challenge is designed such that participant decisions materially affect outcomes.

Participants influence performance through:

  • Research

  • Environmental analysis

  • Site selection

  • Deployment methods

  • Monitoring practices

  • Reporting quality

Environmental conditions alone do not determine winners.

The judging process evaluates participant skill, judgment, reasoning, and execution.


12. FRAUD PREVENTION

Timeplast may investigate any submission.

Grounds for disqualification include:

  • Fabricated data

  • Altered photographs

  • Misrepresentation

  • Manipulation of results

  • Failure to comply with rules

  • Conduct contrary to the spirit of the Challenge


13. INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

Participants retain ownership of original submissions.

Participants grant Timeplast a worldwide, perpetual, royalty-free license to:

  • Publish submissions

  • Share photographs

  • Present findings

  • Use reports for research

  • Use content in educational materials

  • Use content in marketing communications

Participants warrant they possess all necessary rights.


14. ASSUMPTION OF RISK

Participants are solely responsible for:

  • Site access permissions

  • Legal compliance

  • Personal safety

  • Environmental compliance

Participants may not trespass, damage property, violate laws, or create environmental hazards.


15. DISPUTE RESOLUTION

Any dispute regarding scoring or judging shall be resolved according to these Official Rules.

Judging determinations are final and binding.


16. RIGHT TO MODIFY

Timeplast reserves the right to:

  • Clarify rules

  • Modify procedures

  • Extend deadlines

  • Suspend participation

  • Cancel the Challenge

if necessary to preserve fairness, scientific integrity, or legal compliance.


17. STATEMENT OF COMPETITION STRUCTURE

The Timeplast Apple Degradation Challenge is a scientific research competition in which winners are determined through demonstrated skill, scientific reasoning, environmental analysis, experimental execution, documentation quality, and observed results.

The Challenge is not a lottery, raffle, sweepstakes, giveaway, or random drawing.

All prizes are awarded exclusively on merit as determined by the published judging criteria.



Next
Next

Understanding VOC Measurements in 3D Printing